We've had the first couple or three of the summer comps now, and I'm a bit more used to playing off the white pots again. The course seemed very long indeed for the first comp, played when everything was still wet through, but last weekend and this have been a lot more like it. Last week was an am/am. Poor Peter (son, off 25): he didn't play with me, but played with three chaps who are new members, joined late last year. NINETY SIX points, they put in, Peter played like a golfing god. Won by eight.......until one of the blokes was found to have an inactive handicap. His scores were take off, and they were down to 82 points and well out of the prizes. I agree with the new rules on inactive handicaps, people should keep their handicaps active etc, but this was a bit 'law of unintended consequences'. Nice bunch of blokes, joined late in the year, have played all winter, when there are no qualifiers, caught out. Maybe we should have given a month's grace or something. Peter was, of course, extremely disappointed.
Sunday was the monthly mixed, we were just outside the prizes but Julie and I both played well. Difficult to say, but I think I would probably have had a 78! Would have been a new record. Flushed with confidence Peter and I both went out in this week's monthly medal. I had a 92 and Peter N/R'd. Just goes to show.
Sunday, 25 April 2010
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Back on the white pots at last
Let me bring you up to speed. Last time, I mentioned that I was standing for the committee. That was more involved than I was expecting, for certain. I don't know about you, but I have always found that as soon as you put your hand up and offer help to any organisation, they nearly tear your arm off to get you in. I think its great that in a golf club, certainly in ours, it isn't quite like that and there is a debate and a vote. In our case committee members stand for two years before offering themselves for re-election, so what appeared to be six candidates for four places in the end was effectively three people for one spot, once the existing committee members were re-elected. We all had to make a presentation, explain what we brought to the party. I'm reasonably comfortable speaking in public (there were probably 200 members there!), the other two guys clearly less so, and to cut a story short, I was elected.
As a marketing man, I'm interested in the set-up, which I suspect mimics most other clubs. There are committees for greens, house, social, competitions, plus the various organisers and captains. To me it's all a bit inward-facing. Our treasurer has done a great job on the new website but there isn't anything in place to give the club a more public face in the community at large apart from suggestions brought to the general committee's monthly meetings . We've started addressing that, with a Facebook group and Twitter feed (@mapperleygolf), but it will be slow work, I think. I'll write more about the committee when its interesting!
To the golf! We've finished the winter comps now. For us, the last two weeks were played on a very sad note, as Andy, the 16-year-old in our group, lost his dad very suddenly. A dreadful thing to happen.
We're back on the back pots now. The course looks very long indeed. In casual rounds, I'm playing great. With a card in my hand, hopeless. Trying to hit the ball too hard and losing tempo, is my current theory. The first qualifier was a Stableford, and I managed the grand total of 27 points. Absolutely useless. A 0.1 for me. Peter played the comp and did well, scoring 38 points and leaving a lot out there, he said, including three blobs. He'll come down nicely this year.
Through March, we've been experimenting with an alternative course layout, swapping over the second and ninth holes. It has been controversial to say the least. Mapperley is a hilly course, and the change introduces an extra hill between the first green and the second tee, so the seniors are against the change right from the start. Most of the ladies too. There's no doubt that the flow of play from second to third and ninth to tenth is improved, and it removes a spot on the course where people can be hit by errant shots. At busy times though it looks as though there's a féte going on by the eighth green as people cross over. I think it will be voted down, but I have mixed feelings.
Yesterday, I got a call from the club at about 2.15. 'Bit of a long shot, but can you play at Ruddington at 4.30?' Apparently the date was wrong in the club calendar and we had an inter-club foursomes match, and it was only when the captain of the other team called to check on something that the cock-up was discovered.
The inter-club foursomes is not, as it sounds, some sort of deviant sexual practice, but is one of the premier competitions in Notts and is usually played between members of the 'scratch teams' (best players in the club, not the likes of me). We got to Rudd, met the other team, from Nottingham City (three out of the four of them 3-handicappers). I vaguely wondered why we were playing in Ruddington rather than at one of the home courses. Foursomes matchplay, like in the Ryder Cup. In failing light at just after 8pm, we ended up all square over the two matches, we were one-down, our other team were one-up. We had to play an extra hole. You couldn't even see the ball at your feet properly, never mind see where you had hit it. We swapped opponents, hacked our way up the first hole. The first match halved the hole, all down to us, receiving a shot. Our opponents were on the green in two, we were over the back of the green in three after I had skied the tee shot and then caught the approach shot a bit thin. Tony, my partner, then played a chip that Tiger Woods would have been proud of to a foot from the hole. The other guys conceded our putt, giving them a putt for the match, two for a half. Their first putt went two feet past and their player looked at me to see whether I would concede the putt. No chance. He missed left and the match was OURS!
It was at this point that someone told me that this was a knock out and all terribly serious. That was why we were at a neutral venue. All very FA cup semi-final. Good luck to the first team in the next round!
As a marketing man, I'm interested in the set-up, which I suspect mimics most other clubs. There are committees for greens, house, social, competitions, plus the various organisers and captains. To me it's all a bit inward-facing. Our treasurer has done a great job on the new website but there isn't anything in place to give the club a more public face in the community at large apart from suggestions brought to the general committee's monthly meetings . We've started addressing that, with a Facebook group and Twitter feed (@mapperleygolf), but it will be slow work, I think. I'll write more about the committee when its interesting!
To the golf! We've finished the winter comps now. For us, the last two weeks were played on a very sad note, as Andy, the 16-year-old in our group, lost his dad very suddenly. A dreadful thing to happen.
We're back on the back pots now. The course looks very long indeed. In casual rounds, I'm playing great. With a card in my hand, hopeless. Trying to hit the ball too hard and losing tempo, is my current theory. The first qualifier was a Stableford, and I managed the grand total of 27 points. Absolutely useless. A 0.1 for me. Peter played the comp and did well, scoring 38 points and leaving a lot out there, he said, including three blobs. He'll come down nicely this year.
Through March, we've been experimenting with an alternative course layout, swapping over the second and ninth holes. It has been controversial to say the least. Mapperley is a hilly course, and the change introduces an extra hill between the first green and the second tee, so the seniors are against the change right from the start. Most of the ladies too. There's no doubt that the flow of play from second to third and ninth to tenth is improved, and it removes a spot on the course where people can be hit by errant shots. At busy times though it looks as though there's a féte going on by the eighth green as people cross over. I think it will be voted down, but I have mixed feelings.
Yesterday, I got a call from the club at about 2.15. 'Bit of a long shot, but can you play at Ruddington at 4.30?' Apparently the date was wrong in the club calendar and we had an inter-club foursomes match, and it was only when the captain of the other team called to check on something that the cock-up was discovered.
The inter-club foursomes is not, as it sounds, some sort of deviant sexual practice, but is one of the premier competitions in Notts and is usually played between members of the 'scratch teams' (best players in the club, not the likes of me). We got to Rudd, met the other team, from Nottingham City (three out of the four of them 3-handicappers). I vaguely wondered why we were playing in Ruddington rather than at one of the home courses. Foursomes matchplay, like in the Ryder Cup. In failing light at just after 8pm, we ended up all square over the two matches, we were one-down, our other team were one-up. We had to play an extra hole. You couldn't even see the ball at your feet properly, never mind see where you had hit it. We swapped opponents, hacked our way up the first hole. The first match halved the hole, all down to us, receiving a shot. Our opponents were on the green in two, we were over the back of the green in three after I had skied the tee shot and then caught the approach shot a bit thin. Tony, my partner, then played a chip that Tiger Woods would have been proud of to a foot from the hole. The other guys conceded our putt, giving them a putt for the match, two for a half. Their first putt went two feet past and their player looked at me to see whether I would concede the putt. No chance. He missed left and the match was OURS!
It was at this point that someone told me that this was a knock out and all terribly serious. That was why we were at a neutral venue. All very FA cup semi-final. Good luck to the first team in the next round!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
